Re: Thread safe containers

[Marc Boris Dürner]

I guess wrapping up stl containers would be the easiest thing to do and
still allow us to 
replace stl with something else if we want to. 
 
When we think about containers, we should also think about making the common
c++ 
String class template class. What was the reason not to use basic_string?  
 
regards, 
Marc 
 
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 13:37, you wrote: 
> I understand libARK had some simplified containers derived from std::. 
> Perhaps these could be reviewed and adapted for threadsafety at the same 
> time? 
> 
> On Sunday 11 January 2004 12:24 am, Marc Boris Dürner wrote: 
> > Hi, 
> > Do we need thread safe container classes for CommonC++? 
> > I would volunteer to do that. 
> > 
> > Basically there are three choices: 
> > 1) write our own container classes 
> > 2) derive from the std:: containers to make them safe 
> > 3) steal containers from another LGPL project 
> > 
> > regards, 
> > Marc 

-- 
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net