Re: Missing CCXX_CLASS_EXPORT on some classes

[David Sugar]

I think the original problem was with a frustrating time adapting it to the 
new String class...but if you want to work on that, it would be very helpful!

On Thursday 11 December 2003 09:04 am, Tobias Erbsland wrote:
> >>>I think this set of classes was dropped in the upcoming 1.1 release,
> >>>which does feature a lot of general cleanup of the Common C++ code.
> >>>Unfortunately, cvs is down at the moment, otherwise I would suggest
> >>>accessing the "testing" branch to confirm this issue.
> >>
> >><panic>Dropped?</panic> I use them in many projects. I hope that's a
> >>joke...
> >
> > You mean it's in active use?!  I actually thought it was not!  But it is
> > very easy to add it back in; 1.1/testing is not in any meaningful way
> > structurally different than 1.0.  But it will have to wait until cvs is
> > again available to get that corrected.
>
> I'd created at least two bigger opensource projects with CommonC++2 and
> with the command line parsing classes. The classes are in the API
> Documentation, and not marked as out-dated. There is also an example in
> the Documentation how to use these classes.
>
> http://smtpspamproxy.sourceforge.net/
> http://rapidozelot.sourceforge.net/ <- it's not finaly moved
>
> regards
> Tobias
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp