Re: AtomicCounter::operator int() constness?

[David Sugar]

Yes, I think you are right....however, gcc will not let one specify 
qualifiers for an int operator.

Federico Montesino Pouzols wrote:

>         Hello everybody,
>
>         Should not `AtomicCounter::operator int()' be const (in lines
> thread.h:454, mutex.cpp:319 and mutex.cpp:393 ?
>
>         Hmm, it seems that for platforms without HAVE_ATOMIC
> (mutex.cpp:393), AtomicCounter::lock would have to be declared
> mutable.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-commoncpp mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-commoncpp