[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugzilla for cfengine
From: |
John Sechrest |
Subject: |
Re: Bugzilla for cfengine |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:01:47 -0800 |
Christian Pearce <address@hidden> writes:
% Before we ask that. How much existing infrastructure would remain in
% Oslo? Regardless:
Right , We have three places: Oslo, savannah and sourceforge.
Right now, oslo only has the website.
And sourceforge has nothing.
Oslo:
* Web Server
- Web site
Savannah
- Web site
* Mailing Lists
New services we are thinking about
- Bug tracking
- Web based SVN viewer
* SVN Repository
* Backups
* shell access for commiters
* compile engine
* regression testing platform
% On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 09:28, John Sechrest wrote:
% >
% > It is certainly possible to create a foundation where we have
% > as much or as little as we want at sourceforge and
% > then put the rest of the services on some other spot.
% >
% > It looks like you are suggesting that for the bug tracker that
% > something like trac or bugzilla would be better than sourceforge (at
% > some level). And that having an alternative hosting makes sense.
% >
% > Let's turn the conversation around a bit. If we had a base configuration
% > on a self hosted machine, what services would be on it?
% >
% >
% >
% > address@hidden (Kevin Campbell) writes:
% >
% > % On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 09:24:20AM -0800, John Sechrest wrote:
% > % >
% > % > Right now, I am focused on the mundane task of moving
% > % > away from Savannah because it has become unreliable
% > % > and because basic requests could not be satisified.
% > % >
% > % > This does open up the door for more involvement in a wider audience
% > % > using the site. Organizing bug reports, organizing material and
% > % > opening up a mechanism for bug submissions, repairs and group
% > % > development make sense.
% > %
% > % Trying to step back from the SVN vs CVS arguement here for the moment
% > % and get back to the bug tracker. At the moment, getting a bug tracking
% > % system up and running and having people insert details into it would be
% > % very helpful to myself, and many others who are using cfengine. There
has
% > % been a fair amount of momentum going on recently, and I'd like for this
% > % to push on if possible.
% > %
% > % I do have my reservations about sourceforge, both from my experience of
% > % trying to use it to view details on other projects, and from reports I
% > % hear from other developers of issues they have with it. From digging on
% > % google to try and find migration scripts to go from bugzilla to sf's
% > % bugtracker, the general concensus is that people want to go the other
% > % way round.
% > %
% > % On that note, could we start using the current bug tracker just now and
% > % inserting bugs into it? I will happily migrate any bug information by
hand
% > % if and when a bug tracker on sf is brought up and running. We may still
% > % find that sf's tracker isn't really up to scratch (or may find the same
% > % with bugzilla), so this also provides an alternative for that case.
% > %
% > % --
% > % Kevin Campbell
% > % GPG key: 06CBB693
% >
% > -----
% > John Sechrest . Helping people use
% > . computers and the Internet
% > . more effectively
% > .
% > . Internet: address@hidden
% > .
% > .
http://www.peak.org/~sechrest
% >
% >
% > _______________________________________________
% > Bug-cfengine mailing list
% > address@hidden
% > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cfengine
% --
% Christian Pearce
% http://www.commnav.com
% http://www.perfectorder.com
%
%
-----
John Sechrest . Helping people use
. computers and the Internet
. more effectively
.
. Internet: address@hidden
.
. http://www.peak.org/~sechrest
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, (continued)
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Mitch Collinsworth, 2004/12/14
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, John Sechrest, 2004/12/14
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Kevin Campbell, 2004/12/15
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, John Sechrest, 2004/12/15
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Christian Pearce, 2004/12/15
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Sven Mueller, 2004/12/15
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine,
John Sechrest <=
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Bas van der Vlies, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Cfengine] Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, John Sechrest, 2004/12/16
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Kevin Campbell, 2004/12/15
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Christian Pearce, 2004/12/15
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Darrell Fuhriman, 2004/12/15
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Sven Mueller, 2004/12/14
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, John Sechrest, 2004/12/14
- Re: Bugzilla for cfengine, Sven Mueller, 2004/12/14
- CVS for Cfengine (Was: Re: Bugzille for cfengine), Eric Sorenson, 2004/12/14
- Re: CVS for Cfengine (Was: Re: Bugzille for cfengine), John Sechrest, 2004/12/14