Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton

[Frank Heckenbach]

Akim Demaille wrote:

> > Le 19 mai 2019 à 11:02, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
> > 
> > Also a spelling error: copiable.
> 
> I'm installing this.  Thanks a lot Hans!
> 
>     fix: use copiable, not copyable

Am I missing something? Seems like "copyable" is a valid alternative
form:

  https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/copiable

and commonly used in C++:

  https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/is_trivially_copyable

Regards,
Frank