[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:41:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> I guess that if there is, as Akim says, a dedicated effort for the C-
> parser to compile under C++ in current and upcoming Bison versions,
> there suffices there to be a note of it somewhere that this is the
> case.
Could you please suggest a specific patch, in "diff -u" format? The
point is that all we try to do is to support C compilers. This
includes C++ compilers masquerading as C compilers. It does not
include support for C++ features like C++ destructors.
I'd prefer that a C++ expert write this disclaimer.
> I said that I recall you use(d), under C, memcpy to reallocate the
> parser stack.
No, not if the compiler defines __cplusplus. If the compiler defines
__cplusplus, yacc.c does not use memcpy at all.
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Paul Eggert, 2006/02/11
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Hans Aberg, 2006/02/13
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Paul Eggert, 2006/02/13
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Hans Aberg, 2006/02/14
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Paul Eggert, 2006/02/14
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Hans Aberg, 2006/02/14
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Akim Demaille, 2006/02/20
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Hans Aberg, 2006/02/20
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Akim Demaille, 2006/02/20
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Hans Aberg, 2006/02/20
- Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike, Akim Demaille, 2006/02/20