Re: %destructor feedback

[SteveBravy]

In a message dated 12/21/2005 3:11:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
address@hidden writes:

On Wed,  21 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:

> >>> "Paul" == Paul  Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>  >> - we  desire that in all the skeletons no $n is ever freed from an
>   >> "active" rule, even if we leave it using YYACCEPT, YYERROR,  or
>  >> YYABORT.
> 
>  > Yes, that  sounds right.
> 
> Well, AFAICS that's already the behavior in  glr.c, isn't it?
> Otherwise I missed the bit of code that is  wrong.

As I recall, it was just YYABORT and YYACCEPT in yacc.c that was  a 
problem.  When I looked at the time, glr.c seemed  fine.

Joel


_______________________________________________
address@hidden  http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison



Hello Folks:
 
I'd like to get off this E-mail list but don't know how to do so. Can any  of 
you give me a hand?
 
cheers