[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Precedence declarations applied to rules
|
From: |
Frank Heckenbach |
|
Subject: |
Re: Precedence declarations applied to rules |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2003 02:26:21 +0200 |
Hans Aberg wrote:
> A more serious problem is that I do no see the exact relation to the other
> method of resolving shift/reduce conflicts by using precedence of tokens.
> These two methods, precedence for rules and precedence for tokens, have an
> overlap, but properly one would want to see whether the latter method is a
> proper subset of the former one or not.
I suppose it is, but perhaps not in the natural way, i.e. you might
have to reformulate the grammar slightly to use the new mechanism in
some cases (but I'm not sure).
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, address@hidden
http://fjf.gnu.de/
GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)
- Re: Controlling the effects of precedence declarations, (continued)
Re: Controlling the effects of precedence declarations, Frank Heckenbach, 2003/05/14
Controlling the effects of precedence declarations, Frank Heckenbach, 2003/05/12