bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in linker script file matching after b1eecf6f66a4a642 (prefix tr


From: Nick Clifton
Subject: Re: Bug in linker script file matching after b1eecf6f66a4a642 (prefix tree)
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 13:40:31 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0

Hi Andrew,

Apologies for the generic subject, I don't totally understand the
nature of the bug.

No worries.  You have the problem narrowed down to a single commit,
which definitely helps.

I have a basic linker script that stopped working after upgrading to
binutils 2.40.  I did a git bisect on the repository and it seems that
the breakage starts with commit
b1eecf6f66a4a642f4cb35688213e6c1c1ffdc79.

Please could you file a bug report for this problem here:

  https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=binutils

Having a bug report like this really helps us to track the bug
and ensure that it can be reviewed in the future, should it ever
come back.


$ ${LD} -o out.bin -T linker.ld lib1.a lib2.a

You have now shown how lib1.a and lib2.a are created.  I assumed
that you did:

  $ ar cr lib1.a test1.o test2.o
  $ ar cr lib2.a test3.o


$ objdump -x out.bin | grep func
c000001e g     F .text  0000000a func3
c000000f g     F .text  0000000f func1
c0000000 g     F .text  0000000f func2

you see that func1 and func2 are in .text rather than .init-text where
they should be.

Yes, this is a bug.  Not sure of the exact cause, but maybe the
new code in commit b1eecf6f66a4a642 in scanning the sections in
reverse order rather than forward order.

Cheers
  Nick





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]