bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0


From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:41:37 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253

--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton <nickc@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b71702f1c01052b70b4fd8157982eadc2132fc24

commit b71702f1c01052b70b4fd8157982eadc2132fc24
Author: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Oct 5 10:40:07 2020 +0100

    GAS: Update the .section directive so that a numeric section index can be
provided when the "o" flag is used.

            PR 26253
    gas     * config/obj-elf.c (obj_elf_section): Accept a numeric value for
            the "o" section flag.  Interpret it as a section index.  Allow an
            index of zero.
            * doc/as.texi: Document the new behaviour.
            * NEWS: Mention the new feature.  Tidy entries.
            * testsuite/gas/elf/sh-link-zero.s: New test.
            * testsuite/gas/elf/sh-link-zero.d: New test driver.
            * testsuite/gas/elf/elf.exp: Run the new test.
            * testsuite/gas/elf/section21.l: Updated expected assembler
            output.

    bfd     * elf.c (_bfd_elf_setup_sections): Do not complain about an
            sh_link value of zero when the SLF_LINK_ORDER flag is set.
            (assign_section_numbers): Likewise.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]