bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/26422] ASAN: elf32_arm_final_link_relocate elf32-arm.c:103


From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Subject: [Bug binutils/26422] ASAN: elf32_arm_final_link_relocate elf32-arm.c:10350
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 13:38:01 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26422

--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra <amodra@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d2327e47ef26dc88192e07b53cbad0b768cecf2e

commit d2327e47ef26dc88192e07b53cbad0b768cecf2e
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Aug 25 14:05:10 2020 +0930

    PR26422, ASAN: elf32_arm_final_link_relocate elf32-arm.c:10351

    Always reading 32 bits in order to extract addends from instruction
    fields is wrong when the field size is smaller.  It also leads to
    reading past the end of the section.  This patch tidies that by
    reading the proper field size, which allows some later refetching of
    addends to disappear.

            PR 26422
            * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_final_link_relocate): Use the appropriate
            bfd_get_x size function to read addends out of fields.  Apply
            rightshift adjustment too.  Don't apply the now unnecessary
            howto->size shift to branch REL addends.  Don't refetch R_ARM_ABS8
            and R_ARM_ABS16 addends.  Don't refetch thumb branch addends.
            Correct R_ARM_THM_JUMP6 addend.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]