[Bug gas/25438] x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

[jbeulich at suse dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438

--- Comment #10 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Please submit a single patch to fix this bug.

How is

https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-12/msg00346.html

not a single patch? From that series
- patches 1 and 2 have been committed
- patch 3 demonstrates current (good as well as bad) behavior, to help show
more clearly how ...
- patch 4 fixes this issue (alongside other ones, but all by the same actual
code changes).

Would you _please_ take a _proper_ look at patches 3 and 4 of that series? It
is telling enough that you moved from an initial

"We can't change the encoding nor disallow it."

response to

"movzbw %al, %ecx
 movzbw %al, %rcx
 movzbl %al, %cx
 movzbl %al, %rcx
 movzbq %al, %cx
 movzbq %al, %ecx

 should be hard error.   Clearly they are typos."

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.