[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276 |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:14:25 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3)
Hi Dave,
> There's something wierd going on. I did a full build and check with patches
> for ld/25326 and ld/25327
> and the following teats failed:
>
> FAIL: Run with libfunc1.so comm1.o
> FAIL: Run pr20267a
> FAIL: Run pr20267b
>
> I then reran the testsuite and these tests didn't fail. In my first check,
> I just reran testsuite with patches.
OK - that is strange. Do you still have the ld.log file for the failing tests
? If so, please can you inspect it and see if the "-fcommon" option added by
the patch is present on the command lines used to build pr20267a and pr20267b ?
Is it possible that different versions of gcc are being used for the failing
and passing versions of the tests ?
Uh - not sure how else this could happen... :-(
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, nickc at redhat dot com, 2020/01/03
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, nickc at redhat dot com, 2020/01/03
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, nickc at redhat dot com, 2020/01/03
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, dave.anglin at bell dot net, 2020/01/04
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, dave.anglin at bell dot net, 2020/01/04
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, dave.anglin at bell dot net, 2020/01/06
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/01/06
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, nickc at redhat dot com, 2020/01/06
- [Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/01/08