bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/18573] New: windres: resources alignment does not work.


From: sashipa.ben at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug binutils/18573] New: windres: resources alignment does not work.
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:39:21 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18573

            Bug ID: 18573
           Summary: windres: resources alignment does not work.
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.25
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: binutils
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: sashipa.ben at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 8382
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8382&action=edit
Sample code to illustrate windres resource alignment problem

Hello,

I've just noticed this problem with windres (gave me a bit of a hardtime to
understand the problem).

The resource compiled with windres are not aligned.

Despite this https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16065 

I'm not sure what this code does. But it does not seem to align the resources.
This would not be a big problem if it did not break some resources. For
instance dialogs with combo box control that are not 32-bit aligned won't open
properly (possibly some other controls). It's tricky enough as it does not
generate any kind of error. Windows will just send a premature WM_DESTROY
before the WM_INITDIALOG.

I had a quick look at the source code. The easiest way to fix the problem seems
to force the alignment in the binutils/resbin.c:res_to_bin() function. I've
tried that and it worked but I did not watch the whole code in depth so I'm not
sure it has any unexpected side effect.

I've attached a little program to demonstrate the problem.

Best regards,
G.B

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]