[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly
From: |
jakub at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly |
Date: |
22 Jul 2009 20:52:49 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2009-07-22 20:52
-------
When linked with 2.19.51.0.11 (which works), .rela.plt contains:
Relocation section '.rela.plt' at offset 0x1a0 contains 8 entries:
Offset Info Type Symbol's Value
Symbol's Name + Addend
00000000006c65d0 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000421a50
00000000006c65d8 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
000000000041f720
00000000006c65e0 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000423a30
00000000006c65e8 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000423a30
00000000006c65f0 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000423ed0
00000000006c65f8 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000479060
00000000006c6600 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
000000000041e760
00000000006c6608 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
000000000047a030
where
2532: 000000000047a030 68 IFUNC WEAK DEFAULT 6 stpncpy
1394: 0000000000421a50 68 IFUNC WEAK DEFAULT 6 stpcpy
But when linked with trunk, this is:
00000000006c65d0 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
000000000047a030
00000000006c65d8 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
000000000041f720
00000000006c65e0 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000423a30
00000000006c65e8 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000423a30
00000000006c65f0 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000423ed0
00000000006c65f8 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
0000000000479060
00000000006c6600 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
000000000041e760
00000000006c6608 0000000000000025 R_X86_64_IRELATIVE
000000000047a030
and the symbols are the same. And indeed, the only changes between the two
binaries are 3 bytes in .rela.plt section:
Relocation section '.rela.plt' at offset 0x1a0 contains 8 entries:
Offset Info Type Symbol's Value
Symbol's Name + Addend
-00000000006c65d0 0000000000000025 unrecognized: 25
000000000047a030
+00000000006c65d0 0000000000000025 unrecognized: 25
0000000000421a50
and content of .note.gnu.build-id section.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10433
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/10433] New: Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, jakub at redhat dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, drepper at redhat dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, jakub at redhat dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly,
jakub at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/22
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/07/23
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/07/23
- [Bug ld/10433] Latest ld fails to link ldconfig properly, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2009/07/23