bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Having an alias and a function with the same name leads to some sort


From: Dale R. Worley
Subject: Re: Having an alias and a function with the same name leads to some sort of recursion
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 11:36:49 -0500

Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> writes:
> On 2/14/23 2:58 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>>>> Looking at the manual page, it says
>>>>
>>>>      ALIASES
>>>>         Aliases  allow a string to be substituted for a word when it is 
>>>> used as
>>>>         the first word of a simple command.
>> 
>> Martin suggested (but IIUC didn't sent to this list):
>>> "Beginning of a simple command" should probably be replaced by something
>>> more along the lines of "beginning of any command that does not start with
>>> a keyword (such as "while", "if", "case", etc) or assignment.
>> 
>> Though I think by "keyword" he means "reserved word".
>
> I think the issue is that he's applying a grammar interpretation (simple
> command) to something that is a completely lexical operation. Alias
> expansion happens in the lexical analyzer, and it happens when a token
> can potentially be the first word of a simple command.

Well, (1) I'm looking at it based on the *documentation*, which says
"simple command".  And my essential point is that the documentation
should be adjusted to handle this specific case, viz. alias-izing the
name of a function that one wants to define without a "function"
reserved word.  Let me reiterate that, for a lot of these odd points,
I'm much more fussy that the documentation describes what Bash does than
that I particularly prefer the choice the Bash implementation does.

All of that is qualified by (2) The actual workings of aliases are
complicated, and as you note, in the lexing rather than the parsing.
But contrary to my point (1), I'm willing to tell anyone who uses
aliases to modify things that are grammatically salient (rather than
command names) that they are in "here be dragons" territory, it's their
problem if the documentation doesn't clearly delineate what will happen,
and they need to test examples to tell.

So then, (3) What is a practical change to the manual page?  The first
three sentences in version 5.1.0(1) are:

ALIASES
       Aliases  allow a string to be substituted for a word when it is used as
       the first word of a simple command.  The  shell  maintains  a  list  of
       aliases  that  may  be set and unset with the alias and unalias builtin
       commands (see SHELL BUILTIN COMMANDS below).  The first  word  of  each
       simple  command, if unquoted, is checked to see if it has an
       alias.

I think this change covers the case we're talking about, clarifies the
second sentence a bit, and seems to be well-aligned with the more
detailed truth:

       Aliases allow a string to be substituted for a word when it is
       used as the first word of a simple command.  The alias and
       unalias builtin commands (see SHELL BUILTIN COMMANDS below) set
       and unset aliases.  Reserved words may not be aliased, but all
       other tokens may.  A word in a position which could start a
       simple command, if unquoted, is checked to see if it has an
       alias.  (A side effect is that the function name in a function
       definition that does not start with the "function" keyword is
       checked for alias expansion.)

Dale



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]