Re: some unknown bug, says : command not found

[Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev]

i did a gawk inlined bash version
without stuff loaded it works, but with stuff it results in the same err
i didnt test the orig without loaded stuff

i may post a tgz to instantly test

how i dont expect 'send right away' :/

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, 22:21 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com> wrote:

> the bugfix was quote "$xblpp" ( it being . or cat ) , no quoting resulted
> in the said empty command not found err
>
> im a bit disappointed by no dev help about the .c sources, the bug is in
> the flex thingy
> okay its big code or so to test in case
>
> i can maybe create a version with the .gawk files expanded inside, and it
> may bug the same, will you test it then ?
>
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 01:12 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> on that other side it would say . not found, which it never did, so no
>> '' vs hard var def
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 01:10 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> can it be that i must eval it and it used to work by luck, or something ?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021, 01:04 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> it doesnt stop by itself..
>>>> so i wanted to ask the c and gdb et la folks for help
>>>>
>>>> interactive sources its rc on twice or more says on
>>>> $xblpp <( .. )
>>>> in set -x
>>>> '' /dev/fd/63
>>>> for: command not found
>>>>
>>>> 1. i dont have "$xblpp" <( .. ) i have $xblpp <( .. )
>>>> 2. on first run, also as it uses to work for sourcing, it works, just
>>>> yet have seen on second tries
>>>> 3. xblpp= is a upper script part definition, no ifs, and if declare
>>>> -p'ed it shows the right content ( '.' in case, or cat )
>>>>
>>>> so i figured, if someone is so nice to share some util cmd usage know
>>>> how
>>>>
>>>> cause) ive seen in my last gdb usage ( maybe cause new version or so )
>>>> it displayed a well tree of calls and their args, for on segfault
>>>> i) dunno gdb breakpoints but i think its the right for this and so i
>>>> wanna use it ( so i ask .. )
>>>>
>>>> a) make gdb breakpoint on somehow that position
>>>> a.2) show the list of calls, and see why it says empty arg
>>>> a.3) yea thats the solution, no ?
>>>>
>>>> sorry, thanks
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021, 12:20 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> i checked the file with bvi, i dont see anything
>>>>> 2a 20 20 63 61
>>>>> nothing, its a bash bug somewhere no ? none tried ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021, 11:33 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> xble='declare -p xblpp' . xbl
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bash: : command not found
>>>>>> declare -- xblpp="."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this means the $xblpp is at end set to the right, as set on the
>>>>>> beginning
>>>>>> but it still says and set -x es '' <( ., ) instead of . or cat <( .. )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> anyone any idea ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> see chet such ( masswise ) i meant with unreported hogging bugs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 13:53 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but how why or to fix
>>>>>>> thers the code, thers the set -x parts
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ++ xblpp=.
>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>> ++ '' /dev/fd/63
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 13:49 Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev <fxmbsw7@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i dont have "$var" <( sub ) i have $var <( sub )
>>>>>>>> else it makes sense
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 13:42 Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:52:24AM +0100, Alex fxmbsw7 Ratchev
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> > to answer around what was written, i dont have a cat alias
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > but what mr andreas wrote seems much similiar to what i do,
>>>>>>>>> process sub..
>>>>>>>>> > ill check the vars carefully but i dont get it fully
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> unicorn:~$ bash
>>>>>>>>> unicorn:~$ $xyz <( true )
>>>>>>>>> bash: /dev/fd/63: Permission denied
>>>>>>>>> unicorn:~$ "$xyz" <( true )
>>>>>>>>> bash: : command not found
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > but, on your all tries to produce command not found, can u set
>>>>>>>>> -x the
>>>>>>>>> > tries, .. in mine it shows ++++ cat ... then command not found,
>>>>>>>>> like the
>>>>>>>>> > cat is gone somehow
>>>>>>>>> > means does yours produce a + cat ( or cmd ) and then just
>>>>>>>>> display command
>>>>>>>>> > not found
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> unicorn:~$ bash
>>>>>>>>> unicorn:~$ set -x
>>>>>>>>> unicorn:~$ "$xyz" <( cat /dev/null )
>>>>>>>>> + '' /dev/fd/63
>>>>>>>>> ++ cat /dev/null
>>>>>>>>> bash: : command not found
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't know what else to tell you.  Your customized environment
>>>>>>>>> is so
>>>>>>>>> ridiculously convoluted that NOBODY understands it, not even you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Either this is helpful, or not.  I don't think you're going to get
>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>> better results from help-bash or bug-bash than this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In any case, I'm 99% sure this is not a bug in bash -- only in one
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> your files.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>