[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:49:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:29:28PM +0200, Roman Rakus wrote:
> Is it possible to add more traps to arithmetic evaluation?
> Repeated by:
> $((2 ** 63 / -1))
>
> Actual result:
> SIGFPE (not catched)
>
> Initial report is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579622
Hmm, I don't get that.
imadev:~$ uname -sr; echo $BASH_VERSION
HP-UX B.10.20
4.1.2(2)-release
imadev:~$ echo $((2 ** 63 / -1))
-9223372036854775808
arc3:~$ uname -sr; echo $BASH_VERSION
Linux 2.6.26-2-686
3.2.39(1)-release
arc3:~$ echo $((2 ** 63 / -1))
-9223372036854775808
- Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Roman Rakus, 2010/04/06
- Re: Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?,
Greg Wooledge <=
- Re: Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Roman Rakus, 2010/04/06
- Re: Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Greg Wooledge, 2010/04/06
- Re: [bash-bug] Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Dr. Werner Fink, 2010/04/06
- Re: [bash-bug] Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/04/06
- Re: [bash-bug] Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Roman Rakus, 2010/04/06
- Re: [bash-bug] Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/04/06
- Re: [bash-bug] Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, John Reiser, 2010/04/06
- Re: [bash-bug] Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Roman Rakus, 2010/04/06
- Re: [bash-bug] Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Chet Ramey, 2010/04/06
- Re: Can arithmetic evaluation trap more than just division by zero?, Roman Rakus, 2010/04/06