Re: -local vs. -hook?

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Ben,

* Ben Pfaff wrote on Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:13:40PM CEST:
> address@hidden (Karl Berry) writes:
> 
> > +In contrast, some rules also have a way to run another rule, called a
> > address@hidden; these are always executed after their work is done.  The
> 
> The antecedents of "these" and "their" are slightly confusing
> here.  I might reword it as: "...; hooks are always executed
> after the main rule's work is done."

Good point; fixed like this.

Thanks,
Ralf

2008-06-06  Ralf Wildenhues  <address@hidden>

        * doc/automake.texi (Extending): Fix ambivalent wording.
        Report by Ben Pfaff.

diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi
index 5c601dc..47ea2e0 100644
--- a/doc/automake.texi
+++ b/doc/automake.texi
@@ -9296,8 +9296,8 @@ make, there is no way to be sure of that.
 @trindex dist-hook
 
 In contrast, some rules also have a way to run another rule, called a
address@hidden; these are always executed after their work is done.  The
-hook is named after the principal target, with @samp{-hook} appended.
address@hidden; hooks are always executed after the main rule's work is done.
+The hook is named after the principal target, with @samp{-hook} appended.
 The targets allowing hooks are @code{install-data},
 @code{install-exec}, @code{uninstall}, @code{dist}, and
 @code{distcheck}.