Re: Acvhieving the equivalent of check-hook?

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* James Youngman wrote on Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:17:18PM CEST:
> On 5/20/07, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
>> * James Youngman wrote on Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:52:26PM CEST:
>> >
>> > However, it seems to me that while this check is currently performed
>> > at "make dist" time, the _right_ plase for it is "make check".
>> > However, per Tom Tromey's email in January, there is no "check-hook".
>>
>> Would the `check-local' target be ok for you?
>
> Won't that inhibit the running of the DejaGnu test suite?

Have you tried it and it did not work as expected?

> (BTW, the reply-to header of your email pointed at me; was that 
> deliberate?)

There was no Reply-To: header in the mail I sent, nor in the one I
received from lists.gnu.org.  My mailer does set Mail-Followup-To:,
in this case to bug-automake and to you.  But that should not be a
problem AFAIK.  Could you (privately) send me the header of the mail
you received?

Thanks,
Ralf