[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backward-incompatible bug in recent CVS automake?
|
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
|
Subject: |
Re: backward-incompatible bug in recent CVS automake? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 23:01:36 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) |
> >>> "Harlan" == Harlan Stenn <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Harlan> But it may be easier to fix now, and obviate the patch
> Harlan> I sent in that hasn't been applied because I haven't
> Harlan> sent in the hardcopy copyright assignment yet.
>
> Sorry, I agree it's a bug, but I'm confused by the subject line and the
> above paragraph. Has this ever worked? Is this different from
> the other bug for which you sent a patch?
You are probably right - I have several versions of automake installed at
the site where I made this report, and it's possible (likely?) that I got a
"patched" version of automake-1.5 when I made this report.
I have an updated patch set for CVS automake if that would be of help.
I can also probably arrange to get the hardcopy assignment mailed off
tomorrow, with a little luck.
H