[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in autoconf-2.64
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: bug in autoconf-2.64 |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:08:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
Hello,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:50:32AM CET:
> Unless I did it wrong (entirely possible) -
> 76d1c49b8056aaf3f1046ba19c6dea6eb6aecb78 is the first bad commit -
I can confirm the issue, but my bisect ended at
5e763da323f3927159b6c151f186569a9929ddbe instead.
(You need to use 'git submodule update' after each
step, to recreate the gnulib, then
gnulib/gnulib-tool --update
autoreconf -v
and then rebuild from scratch again).
I'm starting bisect over the gnulib update in above commit now,
which ranges from c0ebdfe226c38c72db7c1944113fd19ff534e362 to
b86f488e783121f54dbd44e17741fa3b29e9be9b.
Thanks for looking into this!
Ralf
- bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Peter O'Gorman, 2011/02/22
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/23
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/23
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Mike Stump, 2011/02/23
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Jim Meyering, 2011/02/24
- Re: bug in autoconf-2.64, Eric Blake, 2011/02/26