bug#20295: 11.88.3; AUCTeX, ESS, Noweb, and "Error running timer `font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay': (wrong-number-of-arguments (2 . 2) 3)"

[Bourgoin, Mario]

Hi Tassilo,

Thank you for answering.

> What does `C-h f font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay' show?

I get
----
font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay is a compiled Lisp function in 
`font-latex.el'.

(font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay BUF START END)

Compatibility for Emacsen not offering `jit-lock-force-redisplay'.
----
The file `font-latex.el' has the following in its header:
;; Authors:    Peter S. Galbraith <address@hidden>
;;             Simon Marshall <address@hidden>
;; Maintainer: address@hidden
;; Created:    06 July 1996
;; Keywords:   tex, wp, faces

The error's back trace when debug-on-error is t shows the following:
----
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments (2 . 2) 3)
  jit-lock-force-redisplay(#<buffer foo.Rnw> 48 60)
  font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay(#<buffer foo.Rnw> 48 60)
  apply(font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay (#<buffer foo.Rnw> 48 60))
  byte-code("r\301\302H\303H\"\210)\301\207" [timer apply 5 6] 4)
  timer-event-handler([t 21804 4831 916000 nil 
font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay (#<buffer foo.Rnw> 48 60) nil 0])
  read-string("Label: " "sec:foo")
  byte-code("\306      \"address@hidden
@       \"9\312\211:;\312\211<=\312\211>address@hidden:
----

And `C-h f jit-lock-force-redisplay' reveals:
----
jit-lock-force-redisplay is a compiled Lisp function in `jit-lock.el'.

(jit-lock-force-redisplay START END)

Force the display engine to re-render START's buffer from START to END.
This applies to the buffer associated with marker START.
----
The file `jit-lock.el' gas the following in its header:
;; Author: Gerd Moellmann <address@hidden>
;; Keywords: faces files
;; Package: emacs

;; This file is part of GNU Emacs.

Indeed, the definition of ` font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay' begins as 
follows:
----
(defun font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay (buf start end)
  "Compatibility for Emacsen not offering `jit-lock-force-redisplay'."
  (if (fboundp 'jit-lock-force-redisplay)
      (jit-lock-force-redisplay buf start end)
----
So it calls the apparently two-argument jit-lock-force-redisplay with three 
arguments.

Mario Bourgoin
Senior Data Scientist - Hopkinton
EMC CTD Symmetrix uCode
(508) 249-1297 Direct

-----Original Message-----
From: Tassilo Horn [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:27 PM
To: Bourgoin, Mario
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: bug#20295: 11.88.3; AUCTeX, ESS, Noweb, and "Error running timer 
`font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay': (wrong-number-of-arguments (2 . 2) 3)"

"Bourgoin, Mario" <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Mario,

> Error running timer `font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay':
> (wrong-number-of-arguments (2 . 2) 3)
>
> Package: 11.88.3

The error says that `font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay' was called with a 
wrong number of arguments, and that 3 arguments where given.  But three is the 
right number of arguments!

What does `C-h f font-latex-jit-lock-force-redisplay' show?  I think you have a 
redefinition of that function with a different number of args laying around 
somewhere.

Bye,
Tassilo