[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] [RFH] Debian reported upstream bugs
From: |
Davide G. M. Salvetti |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] [RFH] Debian reported upstream bugs |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Nov 2014 21:47:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> TH == Tassilo Horn [2014-11-2]
TH> "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <address@hidden>
TH> writes:
[...]
>> would it be wrong to just s/read-string/TeX-read-string/g?
TH> I think that's hardly decidable. Basically, I'd argue that we should
TH> always use `TeX-read-string' when free text is read (because I might
TH> write greek) and `read-string' when fixed things like float positions or
TH> sizes are read (because those are plain ASCII).
This looks like a sensible answer, and indeed with some amount of
patience I could use it to judge where read-string should be left as
read-string and where it should become TeX-read-string.
However, I'm not sure: what would go wrong if we used TeX-read-string
even when plain ASCII is expected? Isn't plain ASCII transparently
mapped to plain ASCII anyway?
--
Thanks,
Davide