[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
From: |
Andreas Breitbach |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:20:27 +0200 |
Am Samstag, den 27.06.2009, 16:33 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
> Please keep the mailing list copied!
>
> * Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-27) writes:
>
> > Am Samstag, den 27.06.2009, 15:42 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
> >>
> >> I still cannot reproduce this, not even with Emacs 22.2, so this will be
> >> difficult to debug without having access to the installation. Anyway,
> >> what's the result if you set `reftex-cite-prompt-optional-args' to nil?
> > I hope to have the time to cross-check this whole stuff with another
> > PC(running Ubuntu 8.10, as far as I remember). With the "nil"
> > applied, it works as it should:
> > \footcite{InternationalSecurity.1Summer.2000}.
>
> Does it help if you apply the following patch to reftex-cite.el,
> recompile and reinstall? Alternatively you can evaluate a patched
> version of `reftex-do-citation' in a running Emacs session by copying
> its definition into the *scratch* buffer and typing `C-M-x' with point
> in it.
With the applied patch it works:
\footcite[43]{InternationalSecurity.1Summer.2000}.
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex,
Andreas Breitbach <=