[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
From: |
Matthew Lundin |
Subject: |
[Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:27:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin) |
Andreas Breitbach <address@hidden> writes:
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.06.2009, 19:21 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
>> * Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-02) writes:
>>
>> > I'm using Biblatex instead of Bibtex, for which AucTex/RefTex seems to
>> > be preconfigured. The basic functions like inserting citations,
>> > bibliographies and so on work quite well. But there's some very strange
>> > behavior when i use the folowing lines in my .emacs
>> > (setq reftex-cite-format "\\footcite[]{%l}")
>> > (setq reftex-cite-prompt-optional-args t),
>> > all i do get is "reftex-do-citation: Args out of range: 21, 37"(I think
>> > the numbers change from time to time...). The expected behaviour would
>> > be to insert the optional argument(which follows the citation, ie. a
>> > page number) after the citation.
>>
>> Does it work with the latest released version of RefTeX (available from
>> its home page) or even a CVS checkout? (You might have to wait a bit
>> for the RefTeX repository to become available again after the Savannah
>> outage.)
>
> No, still doesn't work. I tried the CVS, and the error stays the same.
> Is there any way I could get a trace for others to debug, or some other
> way for getting a more detailed description of what's happening?
I tried these settings with reftex-cvs and Carbon Emacs -- GNU Emacs
22.3.1 (i386-apple-darwin9.6.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0).
I cannot duplicate the error. The footcite macro was inserted as
expected and I was prompted for an optional argument.
I hope you find the source of the problem.
Regards,
Matt
- [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/03
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/03
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/05
- [Bug-AUCTeX] Re: 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex,
Matthew Lundin <=
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/05
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/08
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/11
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26