bug-apl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with ⎕FX


From: Dr . Jürgen Sauermann
Subject: Re: Problem with ⎕FX
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:47:25 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1

Hi Blake,

thanks, fixed in SVN 1260.

There was an error in the comparison of function names which made
⎕FX think that the function was pendant. A return value of 1 from ⎕FX
(as below) indicates an error.

Best Regards,
Jürgen


On 4/12/20 5:09 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
Greetings,

I'm not sure what ⎕FX is doing, but it's certainly wrong.

      ∇abc
[1] 111
[2] 222
[3] 333
[4] 444
[5] 555
[6] ∇
      x←⎕CR 'abc'
      x
abc
111
222
333
444
555
      x[4;1]←' '
      x
abc
111
222
 33
444
555
      ⎕fx x
1
      ∇abc[⎕]∇
    ∇
[0]   abc
[1]   111
[2]   222
[3]   333
[4]   444
[5]   555
    ∇


Why is 333 not 33?

Thanks.

Blake



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]