[Bug-apl] compiling

[enztec]

is there a preferred order to compiling the apl binary and libapl 

does doing one before the other deprive something of something? :)   all file 
sizes seem the exact same   except of course libapl.h/.la/.so   and   bin/apl   
 depending on whether --with-libapl is used

i am doing the libapl first then the apl binary 

---

make distclean  gives a lot of 

rm -f Makefile
make[2]: Leaving directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src/testcases'
make[2]: Entering directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src'
Makefile:901: .deps/apl-Archive.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:902: .deps/apl-ArrayIterator.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:903: .deps/apl-Assert.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:904: .deps/apl-Avec.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:905: .deps/apl-Backtrace.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:906: .deps/apl-Bif_F12_FORMAT.Po: No such file or directory
....

i guess using   make clean   is the preferred way?