[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product
From: |
Kacper Gutowski |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2016 12:39:25 +0200 |
On 7 July 2016 at 11:07, Jay Foad wrote:
> (I think you meant ⊂f/A g B on the RHS?)
No, I don't think I did. That enclosure is already a result of reduction.
In any case, the problem seems not to be related to inner product or to
parsing of multiple operators at all. It manifests in any reduction of
a deeply nested array with a primitive function. Lambdas work fine.
Even when using single-element arrays, the result still has a wrong shape:
X←⊂¨,¨⍳2 ⋄ (≡+/X) ≡ (≡{⍺+⍵}/X)
0
X←⊂¨,¨⍳3 ⋄ (⍴⊃+/X) ≡ (⍴⊃{⍺+⍵}/X)
0
-k
- [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/07/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/07/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product,
Kacper Gutowski <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/07/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/08
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/07/08
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/08
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/07/07
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/07