bug-apl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-apl] ISO Monadic Quad-FX


From: Louis de Forcrand
Subject: Re: [Bug-apl] ISO Monadic Quad-FX
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:34:29 +0200

Ah I see where the one comes from now.
This seems like better behaviour than just
signalling domain error as in the standard.
Works as intended!

Thanks,
Louis

On 26 Jun 2016, at 11:18, Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Louis,

the IBM APL2 reference p. 292 says:

Invalid Definition: If the definition is not valid, Z is a scalar integer indicating the
first row of the function or operator line in error. This integer is dependent on ⎕IO.

I believe the equivalence mentioned in the ISO standard is only valid when the
function definition C is valid.

/// Jürgen


On 06/26/2016 03:04 AM, Louis de Forcrand wrote:
I've been browsing through the system functions in the standard,
and found a (somewhat negligible) inconsistency in GNU APL's
implementation of monadic ⎕FX.

Shouldn't this use of ⎕FX:
- define a monad TEST
- return 'TEST'
?

      )CLEAR
CLEAR WS
      ⎕FX ⊃'∇Z←TEST X' '⎕←"hi"' 'Z←X∇'
1
      )FNS
      TEST 5
VALUE ERROR
      TEST 5
      ^
      
Clearly ⎕CR ⎕FX C yields an error as well, while the standard
states that it should be equivalent to C (which is a well-formed
character matrix) on page 203. In addition, AFAIK GNU APL's
⎕FX returns 1 no matter what I feed it. Maybe my character
matrix is ill-formed?
Yes, I should remove the del characters. Then ⎕FX works as
described in the standard, except when it should signal errors.
Unless the returned 1 is intended behaviour?


Thanks,
Louis




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]