bison-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] cex: fix leaks


From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cex: fix leaks
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 08:33:03 +0200

Hi Vincent,

Gnulib's list are certainly very convenient, but their lack of templating also 
makes things harder to follow: typing is weak, everything is a gl_list_t.

I think we should at least use typedef to clarify what different types of list 
exist (e.g., parse_state_list_t).  I'm of course well aware that the compiler 
will not check we use these types consistently, but it should definitely help 
us understanding what is going on.

I have installed the appended commit.  The memory leaks are clearly coming from 
the parse simulator, but I don't understand enough of its architecture to fix 
them.  It seems clear for instance that we are leaking new_root, but adding 
`free_parse_state (new_root)` where it seems to make sense results in crashes.

I'm attaching testsuite.log for 243 with line numbers.  This was the piece of 
information I was missing last time.  If you want them too, here's how I got 
them on a mac (I should add this to README-hacking).

1. I used gcc 10 (coming from MacPorts FWIW, sudo port install gcc10)

2. I configured with
   $ ~bison/configure '-C' 'CC=gcc-mp-10 -fsanitize=address' 'CXX=g++-mp-10.0 
-fsanitize=address' 'LDFLAGS=-L/opt/local/lib' '--enable-gcc-warnings' 'CFLAGS= 
-ggdb' 'CPPFLAGS=-isystem /opt/local/include' 'CXXFLAGS=-ggdb'

3. compile

4. Force the generation of debug symbols:
   $ dsymutil src/bison

5. Run the cex tests with leak detection enabled
   $ make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-j5 -k cex' ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=1


I couldn't get clang to generate file/line diagnostics.

I believe all the "plain" compilers (no sanitizers) of the CI will properly 
pass this time, I fixed the last minor portability issue:

https://travis-ci.org/github/akimd/bison/builds/688241839

Vincent, if there's a way I can be of use here, please tell me.  I do not 
understand how memory management is dealt with here, so I feel useless.  It 
should be documented somewhere.  Is it?  Maybe I overlooked that.

Cheers!

Attachment: testsuite.log
Description: Binary data


commit 556a01cb123e1d75a53d588f8a73454b319d9ad2
Author: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
Date:   Mon May 18 08:00:37 2020 +0200

    cex: style changes in parse-simulation
    
    * src/parse-simulation.c: Formatting changes.
    (parse_state_list_new): New.
    Use it.

diff --git a/src/parse-simulation.c b/src/parse-simulation.c
index 1320efaa..0c399e64 100644
--- a/src/parse-simulation.c
+++ b/src/parse-simulation.c
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ typedef struct
   size_t total_size;
 } ps_chunk;
 
-struct parse_state;
 typedef struct parse_state
 {
   // path of state-items the parser has traversed
@@ -86,11 +85,11 @@ static int frees = 0;
 static parse_state *
 empty_parse_state (void)
 {
-  parse_state *res = xcalloc (1, sizeof (parse_state));
-  res->state_items.contents = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL,
-                                                    NULL, NULL, true);
-  res->derivs.contents = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL,
-                                               NULL, NULL, true);
+  parse_state *res = xcalloc (1, sizeof *res);
+  res->state_items.contents
+    = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, true);
+  res->derivs.contents
+    = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, true);
   ++allocs;
   return res;
 }
@@ -109,10 +108,10 @@ copy_parse_state (bool prepend, parse_state *parent)
 {
   parse_state *res = xmalloc (sizeof *res);
   memcpy (res, parent, sizeof *res);
-  res->state_items.contents = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL,
-                                                    NULL, NULL, true);
-  res->derivs.contents = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL,
-                                               NULL, NULL, true);
+  res->state_items.contents
+    = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, true);
+  res->derivs.contents
+    = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, true);
   res->parent = parent;
   res->prepend = prepend;
   res->reference_count = 0;
@@ -216,8 +215,9 @@ parse_state_comparator (const parse_state *ps1, const 
parse_state *ps2)
 {
   const ps_chunk *sis1 = &ps1->state_items;
   const ps_chunk *sis2 = &ps2->state_items;
-  return sis1->head_elt == sis2->head_elt &&
-    sis1->tail_elt == sis2->tail_elt && sis1->total_size == sis2->total_size;
+  return sis1->head_elt == sis2->head_elt
+    && sis1->tail_elt == sis2->tail_elt
+    && sis1->total_size == sis2->total_size;
 }
 
 
@@ -273,6 +273,14 @@ list_flatten_and_split (gl_list_t *list, gl_list_t *rets, 
int split, int n)
     }
 }
 
+static gl_list_t
+parse_state_list_new (void)
+{
+  return gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL,
+                               (gl_listelement_dispose_fn)free_parse_state,
+                               true);
+}
+
 // Emulates a reduction on a parse state by popping some amount of
 // derivations and state_items off of the parse_state and returning
 // the result in ret. Returns the derivation of what's popped.
@@ -283,7 +291,7 @@ parser_pop (parse_state *ps, int deriv_index,
   // prepend sis, append sis, prepend derivs, append derivs
   gl_list_t chunks[4];
   for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
-    chunks[i] = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, 1);
+    chunks[i] = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, true);
   for (parse_state *pn = ps; pn != NULL; pn = pn->parent)
     {
       if (pn->prepend)
@@ -298,7 +306,7 @@ parser_pop (parse_state *ps, int deriv_index,
         }
     }
   gl_list_t popped_derivs =
-    gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, 1);
+    gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL, NULL, true);
   gl_list_t ret_chunks[4] = { ret->state_items.contents, NULL,
     ret->derivs.contents, popped_derivs
   };
@@ -385,10 +393,7 @@ simulate_transition (parse_state *ps)
   symbol_number sym = item_number_as_symbol_number (*si->item);
   // Transition on the same next symbol, taking nullable
   // symbols into account.
-  gl_list_t result =
-    gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL,
-                          (gl_listelement_dispose_fn)free_parse_state,
-                          true);
+  gl_list_t result = parse_state_list_new ();
   state_item_number si_next = si_trans[si - state_items];
   // check for disabled transition, shouldn't happen
   // as any state_items that lead to these should be
@@ -427,10 +432,7 @@ compatible (symbol_number sym1, symbol_number sym2)
 gl_list_t
 simulate_production (parse_state *ps, symbol_number compat_sym)
 {
-  gl_list_t result =
-    gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL,
-                          (gl_listelement_dispose_fn)free_parse_state,
-                          true);
+  gl_list_t result = parse_state_list_new ();
   const state_item *si = parse_state_tail (ps);
   bitset prod = si_prods_lookup (si - state_items);
   if (prod)
@@ -463,10 +465,7 @@ simulate_production (parse_state *ps, symbol_number 
compat_sym)
 gl_list_t
 simulate_reduction (parse_state *ps, int rule_len, bitset symbol_set)
 {
-  gl_list_t result =
-    gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL,
-                          (gl_listelement_dispose_fn)free_parse_state,
-                          true);
+  gl_list_t result = parse_state_list_new ();
 
   int s_size = ps->state_items.total_size;
   int d_size = ps->derivs.total_size;
@@ -524,10 +523,7 @@ simulate_reduction (parse_state *ps, int rule_len, bitset 
symbol_set)
 gl_list_t
 parser_prepend (parse_state *ps)
 {
-  gl_list_t result = gl_list_create_empty (GL_LINKED_LIST, NULL, NULL,
-                                           (gl_listelement_dispose_fn)
-                                           free_parse_state,
-                                           true);
+  gl_list_t result = parse_state_list_new ();
   const state_item *head = ps->state_items.head_elt;
   bitset prev = si_revs[head - state_items];
   symbol_number prepend_sym =


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]