[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: Missing \n
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: Missing \n |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:40:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "JED" == Joel E Denny <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Joel,
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Joel E. Denny wrote:
>> Ugh. Actually, the undocumented %nterm can associate a string
>> literal with a nonterminal. I never noticed that before, and I
>> think I broke it some time ago. I'll have to investigate this
>> further.
Hum, I always thought the feature was active for both nonterminals and
terminals.
I think Bison should warn about unused symbols on stderr too: indeed,
in the *.output file it does report that "expression" was unused, but
there was no reason to read that file.
> I take that back: it's been broken for a long time. This grammar:
> %nterm foo "foo"
> %%
> start: ;
> produces a seg fault for me in 2.3a, 2.3, 2.2, and 2.1 (which was
> released before I did any work in this area).
> %nterm isn't documented, so I doubt I'll look at this further any
> time soon.
No problem with me.
- FYI: Missing \n, Akim Demaille, 2007/01/16
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Akim Demaille, 2007/01/16
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Joel E. Denny, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Joel E. Denny, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Joel E. Denny, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Akim Demaille, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Joel E. Denny, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Akim Demaille, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Akim Demaille, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Joel E. Denny, 2007/01/17
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Akim Demaille, 2007/01/19
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Joel E. Denny, 2007/01/19
- Re: FYI: Missing \n, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/01/21