[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make maintainer-check broke
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: make maintainer-check broke |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:52:55 -0500 (EST) |
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Fixed it. Good thinking Joel :)
Great.
> So, should I try any other configurations?
Nah, thanks. I think it's clear that we need Autoconf 2.61, which
requires a newer M4. However, I see no evidence that Bison users (who
shouldn't need to run Autoconf) need the newer versions for either.
I committed this.
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/bison/bison/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1619
diff -p -u -r1.1619 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 13 Dec 2006 20:23:19 -0000 1.1619
+++ ChangeLog 13 Dec 2006 22:49:44 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-12-13 Joel E. Denny <address@hidden>
+
+ * configure.ac (AC_PREREQ): Require Autoconf 2.61 because of our
+ strange test case titles. Reported by Bob Rossi.
+
2006-12-13 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
* TODO: Add pointer to Sylvain Schmitz's work on static detection
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/bison/bison/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -p -u -r1.76 configure.ac
--- configure.ac 15 Oct 2006 00:02:21 -0000 1.76
+++ configure.ac 13 Dec 2006 22:49:44 -0000
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
# 02110-1301 USA
-# We use macros like AC_CHECK_HEADERS_ONCE, so we need Autoconf 2.60 or better.
-AC_PREREQ(2.60)
+# We have strange test case titles, so we need Autoconf 2.61 or better.
+AC_PREREQ(2.61)
AC_INIT([GNU Bison], [2.3a+], address@hidden)
AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux])
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: make maintainer-check broke,
Joel E. Denny <=