[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: symbol declarations after rules
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: symbol declarations after rules |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:55:51 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> Again, it seems reasonable that a user may wish to add a %*-header
> declaration to an existing grammar file that already uses Yacc prologues.
> While that won't produce the cleanest grammar file, I think Bison's
> behavior in that case is not too hard to understand:
Stylistic warnings belong with -Wall, right?
Joel
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, (continued)
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/22
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/23
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/23
- Re: symbol declarations after rules,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/27
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/26
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/26
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/27
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/27
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/27
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/27
- Re: symbol declarations after rules, Akim Demaille, 2006/06/28
Re: symbol declarations after rules, Joel E. Denny, 2006/06/24