[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --yacc and token #define's
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: --yacc and token #define's |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:09:52 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> We didn't discuss removing the enum in the presence of --yacc. That would
> make `bison -y' more yacc-like, I guess. Any reason not to remove it?
It would make the output of "bison -y" harder to debug with GDB, on
some platforms. Is there any harm to keeping the enum?
> The man page still states that --fixed-output-files is equivalent to
> --yacc
I'd forgotten all about the man page. Ouch. The man page should be
generated automatically from "bison --help". (But this is another
matter.)
> We want to deprecate --fixed-output-files, right?
Yes.
> I also see
> --fixed-output-files mentioned in "gnulib/doc/standards.texi".
That is fixed easily enough; we shouldn't worry about it as a
compatibility constraint.