[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 00:47:23 -0500 (CDT) |
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Bill Page wrote:
| Correction:
|
| On 8/11/07, I wrote:
| >...
| > This statement in the Axiom book should really say:
| >
| > "domains belong to *named* categories by assertions"
| >
| > This does apply to anonymous categories.
| >
|
| I meant to write:
|
| This does *not* apply to anonymous categories.
Yes, but they gave no indication that they do structural matching.
They gave examples and explanations of why they don't do it
-- even partially. So, the semantics is still mystery...
-- Gaby
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Stephen Wilson, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Bill Page, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Bill Page, 2007/08/11
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure,
Gabriel Dos Reis <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Bill Page, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), William Sit, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Bill Page, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Bill Page, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/12
- RE: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Weiss, Juergen, 2007/08/12
- RE: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/12