[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance.

From: Waldek Hebisch
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance.
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 15:20:17 +0200 (CEST)

C Y wrote:
> > Clisp is also quite portable, so it is possible that CCL offers
> > no advantages over clisp (but this requires more analysis).
> I think the main issue there is the performance of Clisp, which IIRC is
> quite slow compared to CMUCL et. al.

Well, slow program gets answers faster than program which does not
work at all.  CCL/Clisp are good solutions is situations when
gcl/sbcl/cmucl do not work.

Both Clisp and CCL are bytecode interpreters, so for can not be very
fast, but are faster than many folks would think hearing "interpreter".
ATM I can not say which one is faster CCL or clisp.

                              Waldek Hebisch

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]