[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] Should we update the AxiomSources page?

From: C Y
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] Should we update the AxiomSources page?
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 04:41:30 -0700 (PDT)

I tried, but I think the links in the cvs/svn/etc. commands are
triggering the security system.  No good way around that, as those
commands cannot be distorted - they MUST appear in correct form.  Maybe
I'm doing something else wrong though - I never did get the hang of the
anti-spam measures properly...


--- Ralf Hemmecke <address@hidden> wrote:

> Cliff,
> that page seems out of date anyway. So why don't you just follow what
> is 
> written at its bottom?
> Ralf
> On 05/23/2007 06:05 AM, C Y wrote:
> > Tim, in the interests of simplicity can we reorganize the
> AxiomSources
> > page to highlight instructions for cvs/svn of Axiom Gold, git for
> Axiom
> > Silver, and svn for the and wh-sandbox
> > branches?  Do any of the other branches contain work not already
> > incorporated into one or more of the above?  Are the arch branches
> now
> > present in Git?  If we're moving off of arch to Git, we might want
> to
> > make this page reflect that.
> > 
> > We can put the Darcs and Mercurial links under "alternative
> > distribution methods" or some such, but arch should probably go
> away
> > unless there is a compelling reason I'm not aware of to keep it. 
> Can
> > the differences in the arch branches be expressed as git branches
> (or
> > are they already so expressed in your system, if you've moved to
> Git?)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > CY
> > 
> > (Incidently, is the 2005 tarball also the latest Gold release?  If
> not,
> > we should probably fix that...)

 GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]