[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] problems compiling build-improvements 502 was: Re:

From: Gabriel Dos Reis
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] problems compiling build-improvements 502 was: Re: problems compiling wh-sandbox 503
Date: 12 Apr 2007 09:19:20 -0500

Martin Rubey <address@hidden> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis <address@hidden> writes:
| > Martin Rubey <address@hidden> writes:
| > | after installing binutils-dev, m4, libxpm-dev, libx11-dev, libxt-dev,
| > | libext-dev, libxmu-dev, libxmu-headers
| > | 
| > | build-improvements succeeded.
| > 
| > OK.


| > | I am currently retrying wh-sandbox with --enable-checking.
| > 
| > It is not clear to me that wh-sandbox has the --enable-checking bits.  One
| > drawback of Autoconf design is that when configure does not understand an
| > --enable-FEATURE switch, it says nothing.
| Waldek already stated that it hasn't. 

yes, you're right; I saw his message only after I sent mine.

| You see, I really need wh-sandbox because of three reasons:
| * HyperDoc "users" and "dependents" works
| * there are many algebra bug fixes
| * it contains my guessing package
| (the last item depends on the second item, but the first item also is 
| helpful)

I do not doubt wh-sandbox is useful :-)
I believe that part of the HyperDoc and algebra that is known to be
solid and OK should be merged back to build-improvements, while the
other more experimental parts can remain in wh-sandbox until

Ideally, all of this should be merged back to silver, but I don't know
what Silver is.  I would hate to change target every two or three

-- Gaby

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]