[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: gcl-2.6.8pre on MAC OSX 10.2

From: Ralf Hemmecke
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: gcl-2.6.8pre on MAC OSX 10.2
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:45:46 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20060909)

On 11/03/2006 12:23 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
This clarifiers the terminology for me.

Not for me.

Bill seemed to conflict himself when he said that

> In any case, please keep in mind that we had previously agreed that
> all patches to silver would be sent by email to Tim Daly and that
> he would be responsible for review and applying these changes to
> axiom--silver--1. That is the route by which patches are supposed
> to the new svn /silver "trunk".


> SVN /trunk was created to be Silver from which the
> experimental branches would be branched.
> > > axiom--silver--1 was created to be a pre-gold version of
> > > the system with "early release" of changes so they can be
> > > tested.
> No. axiom--silver--1 was created to be a mirror of SVN /trunk
> (now called SVN /silver) so that you would not have to deal
> with the problems of using SVN.

And I have written something on
which is certainly not up-to-date. Unfortunately I am to confused by what is master-silver and what are the copies so that I cannot update this page.

Please, please, don't let the AxiomSources page get out-of-date. With all this SCM mess nobody is going to understand where to start with.

1) Should any new patch be applied to /trunk ?

If we all agreed to send patches to Tim for review, then I would say no.
Silver should always be the same on axiom--silver--1, SF-/silver Google/trunk (or is it also Google/silver?).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]