[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex
From: |
Norman Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:38:15 -0400 |
> I think we should ask Norman Ramsey about this "name mangling".
>
> Does it have a nice solution that would allow us to use
> the version(s) of noweb distributed by Debian?
Sounds like you guys have a local hack.
The underscore issue is a FAQ.
Norman
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Waldek Hebisch [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: October 22, 2006 11:01 AM
> > To: Bill Page
> > Cc: address@hidden; 'Waldek Hebisch';
> > 'address@hidden; address@hidden; Reis'
> > Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex
> >
> >
> > Bill Page wrote:
> > > On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For example latex run on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the
> > > > following errors (I removedother messages which are caused by
> > > > the two errors):
> > > >
> > > > ! Missing $ inserted.
> > > > <inserted text>
> > > > $
> > > > l.13 ...aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_
> > > >
> > > > aux.h}\endmoddef\nwstartde...
> > > > ...
> > >
> > > On October 22, 2006 10:04 AM I wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I do not get any errors in files containing _ in either Tim's
> > > > version distributed with Gold nor with a more recent unmodified
> > > > version of noweb (noweb-2.11b).
> > > >
> > >
> > > In contrast to the output which Waldek shows, in both versions
> > > of noweb run on axiom-developer.org the _ is removed from the
> > > generated noweb commands.\:
> > >
> > > \section{parse\_aux.h}
> > >
> > \nwfilename{parse_aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parseaux
> > .h}\endmoddef
> > > \LA{}license\RA{}
> > >
> > > -----
> > >
> > > Could this be a LOCALE/LANG issue? Or is this behaviour specific
> > > to the version of noweb distributed by Debian?
> > >
> >
> > On 32-bit Debian Sarge with "nowebm 2.10c-3.2" I get the output you
> > show. But on 64-bit Debian testing/unstable using "nowebm 2.10c-3.3"
> > I get:
> >
> > \section{parse\_aux.h}
> > \nwfilename{parse_aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_au
> > x.h}\endmoddef\nwstartdeflinemarkup\nwenddeflinemarkup
> > \LA{}license\RA{}
> >
> >
> > Note that strictly speaking both forms are problematic: the
> > first mangles
> > names, the second passes naked underscore to latex (maybe the
> > intention
> > was to update '\moddef' so that it can handle underscores).
> >
> > --
> > Waldek Hebisch
> > address@hidden
> >
> >
>
>
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/21
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex,
Norman Ramsey <=
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Norman Ramsey, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/22
- RE: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Bill Page, 2006/10/22
- Re: [Axiom-developer] build-improvements and latex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/23