[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp?
From: |
Martin Rubey |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp? |
Date: |
31 Oct 2005 08:59:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
root <address@hidden> writes:
> it's not far away. there are minor package issues but very little else.
> once gcl becomes ansi i'll port it.
>
> i could probably make it run in an ansi common lisp within a few days.
If you have the time, I think this would be worthwile.
A related topic: I recall you saying that you have once rewritten all the boot
code in lisp? Does this code still exist?
Finally, I wonder whether you'd be able to fix the "bug" about dependent types
described in Issue #219...
Martin
- [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp?, C Y, 2005/10/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp?, root, 2005/10/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp?,
Martin Rubey <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp?, root, 2005/10/31
- [Axiom-developer] interp/Bookvol5 (was: ANSI Lisp?), Bill Page, 2005/10/31
- [Axiom-developer] Boot vs. Lisp, C Y, 2005/10/31
- [Axiom-developer] RE: Boot vs. Lisp, Bill Page, 2005/10/31
- RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Boot vs. Lisp, Bill Page, 2005/10/31
- RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Boot vs. Lisp, Bill Page, 2005/10/31
- RE: [Axiom-developer] RE: Boot vs. Lisp, C Y, 2005/10/31
- Re: [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp?, C Y, 2005/10/31
- RE: [Axiom-developer] ANSI Lisp?, Bill Page, 2005/10/31