[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## [Axiom-developer] [#102 solve(sinh(z)=cosh(z), z) ]

**From**: |
kratt6 |

**Subject**: |
[Axiom-developer] [#102 solve(sinh(z)=cosh(z), z) ] |

**Date**: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:20:06 -0500 |

Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/102SolveSinhZCoshZZ/diff
--
It *should* work, given that the compiler does not stumble over some bug.
However, I don't think it is the right direction to take anyway:
- The bugs mentioned here won't go away, since you would have to provide the
third argument, and
- I think that 'reduce' is easier to understand for the casual reader.
Concerning the optimization: in an ideal world, reduce would be optimized away.
We are not in an ideal world, and we will never be, but we should strive to
make it better...
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/address@hidden

**[Axiom-developer] [#102 solve(sinh(z)=cosh(z), z) ]**, *Bill Page*, `2005/10/17`
**[Axiom-developer] [#102 solve(sinh(z)=cosh(z), z) ]**, *kratt6*, `2005/10/18`
**[Axiom-developer] [#102 solve(sinh(z)=cosh(z), z) ]**, *kratt6*, `2005/10/18`
**[Axiom-developer] [#102 solve(sinh(z)=cosh(z), z) ]**,
*kratt6* **<=**
**[Axiom-developer] [#102 solve(sinh(z)=cosh(z), z) ]**, *kratt6*, `2005/10/19`