[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31

**From**: |
Martin Rubey |

**Subject**: |
RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31 |

**Date**: |
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:24:52 +0100 |

Bill Page writes:
>* You know how Knuth choose approximations to the number*
>* \pi for version of TeX? Maybe for Axiom we should do the*
>* same with %e? ;) Like so*
>* *
>* version 2.7*
>* version 2.72*
>* version 2.718*
This is the versioning of metafont, so it doesn't seem appropriate.
I like the patch number best, since it is then a trivial matter to generate the
appropriate source. Also, returning to my wish of letting the user specify an
axiom version, (in fact, needed only in IssueTracker): I guess it would make
this easier, too. Bill: It's needed only per page, at least for a start. You
said,
you ran together the axiom environments to a pile. So, maybe it is possible to
store the optional argument of the first axiom environment into a variable and
then start the Axiom-executable indicated by this optional argument?
Martin

**Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *(continued)*
**RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *Bill Page*, `2005/03/18`
**Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *root*, `2005/03/18`
**RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *Bill Page*, `2005/03/18`
**Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *Bob McElrath*, `2005/03/18`
**RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *Bill Page*, `2005/03/18`
**Re: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *Bob McElrath*, `2005/03/18`
**RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *Andrey G. Grozin*, `2005/03/19`
**RE: [Axiom-developer] axiom--main--1--patch-31**,
*Martin Rubey* **<=**

**[Axiom-developer] Re: axiom--main--1--patch-31**, *Mark Murray*, `2005/03/20`