[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath
From: |
Bertfried Fauser |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 16:02:48 +0200 (CEST) |
On Thu, 13 May 2004, root wrote:
Dear Tim,
> Editors are like wives, you usually only have one and it is very
> hard to change.
Am I allowed to put this into my "quotations" box? ;-))
> It is possible to use the TeXmacs sources to get 90% of the work
> done and change the presentation to be more notebook-like. It seems,
> based on my limited discussions, that the key issues are the folding
> paradigm and the notebook-to-pamphlet data compatibility (i.e. changing
> the notebook changes the pamphlet and vice-versa).
This woudl amount to post two ToDo points to challenge teh TeXmacs
developers
* Add a folding mechanism which allows to fold and unfold in several
document hirarchies like paragraphs, secions, chapters
* Add an export filter which produces pamphelt files from TeXmacs
documents
I think at least the first should be possible for them, since all
applications would benefit from such a feature, the second, hmmm..
> Bill Page's wiki might be an interesting alternative path. I tried to
> write a webpage that "folds" but my javascript isn't up to the task.
> And I'm still pondering how to get the wiki pages back into the
> booklet/pamphlet/tex format. Ideally you could change the book in the
> wiki and have it reflected in the pdf.
The latex+wiki is really beyond everything I was intended to belive!!
However, it looks odd, if renered text (included as image) and usual text
(rendered by the html engine/browser) are mixed. Moreover, it is a bit of
cheating involved. The creator of such a page has to deal with bootom down
LaTeX and wiki(html) formating issues. This is fare away from being a
wysiwyg application.
Really challenging would be a web site where you can drag and drop
elements arrond (among them there may be AXIOM_INPUT elements and
AXIOM_OUTPUT elemenst) without going into the details of formating.
However, this seems to be a remote thing to think of.
So the pragmatical question:
What is the present AXIOM comunity and would it enlarge (gramatically) if
a GUI (other than TeXmacs) would be awailable?
ciao
BF.
% PD Dr Bertfried Fauser
% Institution: Max Planck Institut for Mathematics Leipzig
<http://www.mis.mpg.de>
% Privat Docent: University of Konstanz, Physics Dept
<http://www.uni-konstanz.de>
% contact |-> URL : http://clifford.physik.uni-konstanz.de/~fauser/
% E-Mail : address@hidden (address@hidden)
% Phone : Leipzig +49 341 9959 735 Konstanz +49 7531 693491
- [Axiom-developer] OpenMath, Tim Daly, 2004/05/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath, root, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath, Bertfried Fauser, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath, David MENTRE, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath, root, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath, Mike Dewar, 2004/05/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] OpenMath, root, 2004/05/17