axiom-developer
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Axiom-developer] Re: Axiom's latex output


From: Chris Sangwin
Subject: [Axiom-developer] Re: Axiom's latex output
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:26:14 +0000 (GMT)

This would be fine with me.  
Many thanks indeed.
Chris


On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, root wrote:
> > Chris has raised issues similar to ones you raised in the past.
> > Is there a common set of "standard latex" primitives you both use?
> > If so, we can create another latex output format such as
> >   )set output texmacs
> > that could satify both needs.
> 
> 1) Most of it is standard LaTeX.
> 2) Do not use TeX-oddities like \over and \atop.
> 3) Do not perform manual line-breaking.
> 4) Use \* for multiplication and \big. as a delimiter in
>    \sum_{i=1}^n i \big.
> 
> For the rest, just try, and let me know if you have a problem.
> 
> > > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:43 +0000 (GMT)
> > > From: Chris Sangwin <address@hidden>
> > > To: root <address@hidden>
> > > Subject: Re: [Axiom-mail] TeX vs LaTeX output on AXIOM
> > >
> > > Many thanks Tim for your swift response.
> > >
> > > I'd certainly like to know more about Joris' "standard latex".  I've not
> > > picked up this thread.  I expect a flexible solution would satisfy us
> > > both.  Where is the TeX function defined in the Source.  This is my first
> > > adventure into the AXIOM source, and I have no idea where to begin.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, root wrote:
> > >
> > > > Chris,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the delay. I had to prepare for a class.
> > > >
> > > > As I understand it you would rather have \frac rather than \over
> > > > as output for fractions, for example. Since we have the source
> > > > clearly this can be changed. Unfortunately the change is not likely
> > > > to be simple because the forms are in different order. You would
> > > > like
> > > >
> > > > {a} \over {b}   => \frace{a}{b}
> > > >
> > > > I'll look to see where the latex for \over is created.
> > > > Is it possible to define \over in a .sty file on your side?
> > > >
> > > > Joris has a similar complaint. I'm unsure if his "standard latex"
> > > > is the same as your "standard latex"
> > > >
> > > > An alternative path, which I've also mentioned to Joris, is to
> > > > keep the current output unchanged and implement another output
> > > > (HTML-tool, Texmacs) for the different front ends.
> > > >
> > > > Tim Daly
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > address@hidden
> > >
> > > > Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:20:38 +0100 (CET)
> > > > From: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
> > > > To: David MENTRE <address@hidden>
> > > > Cc: Bill Page <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>,
> > > >    <address@hidden>, "'Joris van der Hoeven'" <address@hidden>
> > > > Subject: Re: TeXmacs / AXIOM under SuSE 8.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The brackets around exponents are superfluous in the LaTeX output.
> >
> 
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]