[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: huh?
From: |
Mark Murray |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: huh? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:30:50 +0000 |
Tim Daly writes:
> >I'm doing a test build right now. There are a zillion more ${SPAD}/notangle
> >that I had to patch locally. Could you please do those as well?
>
> I was unaware that the SPAD variable was used anymore.
D'oh! My mistake - its ${SPADBIN}/notangle :-]
> I removed the only existing use (in the document command) last night.
> I grepped the sources and did not find a ${SPAD}/notangle reference.
> Clearly I missed something. What file does this?
>
> ${SPADBIN}/notangle still exists in Lattice.pamphlet but this file is
> now purely used for documentation purposes. Bill and I were using this
> information to build a lattice.
I'll put my patch up shortly, its taking a while. I found a lot of
${SPADBIN}/notangle references.
> The references to axiom.sty are bogus in two ways:
> (1) I missed the "build location" vs "source location" path walk
NP :-)
> (2) I need to figure out how to put axiom.sty on some sort of path
> that tex uses (anybody know how to do this?)
You need to look at kpathsea. I'll get back to you with
specifics.
> The issue for "committing the patch" (as I understand it) is that
> the C code is "frozen" and no patches are accepted that change it.
That would explain why there is a patch for .c and .nw? I didn't
look too closely at the .c patch, as it looked like a patch to
generated cose, and was thus a little messy ;-).
> I could be wrong. I'm about to patch the tmpname warning so you
> might want to wait a day or two. I'll send you a message once I've
> tested it and put it in the cvs.
NP - I'll catch that when it comes.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH