[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: [gnu.org #48656]
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: [gnu.org #48656] Re: GCL compliance with GNU GPL |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jul 2003 19:05:51 -0400 |
I agree that the LGPL would be better, and I think the FSF agrees too
for this application.
I wouldn't be sad to see GCL under the GPL.
GCL has had its current license for a long time. Is there any
indication that this license has led proprietary software developers
to contribute substantially to GCL, or even led them to use it in
large numbers?
In any case, were we to go GPL, I think at the
minimum we would want to use a proprietary code allowing clause along
the lines of clisp.
That would not work--it would encounter the same problem as using the
LGPL encounters: namely, that the various libraries and copied code
don't have such an exception.
- Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: [gnu.org #48656] Re: GCL compliance with GNU GPL, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/18
- Re: [Maxima] Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: [gnu.org #48656] Re: GCL compliance with GNU GPL,
Richard Stallman <=
- [Axiom-developer] GCL used commercially?, Richard Fateman, 2003/07/20
- [Axiom-developer] Re: GCL used commercially?, Richard Stallman, 2003/07/21
- [Axiom-developer] Re: GCL used commercially?, Richard Fateman, 2003/07/21
- [Axiom-developer] Re: GCL used commercially?, Richard Stallman, 2003/07/23
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [Maxima] Re: GCL used commercially?, Richard Fateman, 2003/07/23
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [Maxima] Re: GCL used commercially?, C Y, 2003/07/23
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [Maxima] Re: GCL used commercially?, Richard Stallman, 2003/07/24
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Maxima] Re: GCL used commercially?, Bill Page, 2003/07/24
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Maxima] Re: GCL used commercially?, Richard Stallman, 2003/07/25
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Maxima] Re: GCL used commercially?, Mike Dewar, 2003/07/25