|
From: | Michael Rice |
Subject: | Re: [avr-libc-dev] Time library |
Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:54:03 -0400 |
Is this something we should worry about? Personally I do not think it will be an important issue, but I would like to have the opinion of the developers.
I spent some time on Google, searching various combinations of time, time.h, atmel, avr, atmega, time(), time_t and mktime(). I did not find much, mostly complaints that time.h is not implemented in avr- libc.: {
My personal ( read: biased! ) opinion is to implement time.h more or less as-is, and provide a configuration switch, --without-time perhaps.
Another palliative may be to split time.h into ephemera.h, time_extras.h, and time.h... or something along those lines.
A third palliative is to prefix all our functions, for example with avr_. I really don't like that one.
I would like to hear the opinion of others on this issue, perhaps some has a better solution.
===In other news, I have rearranged some things, added copyright and $ID $to each file, and have a good start on the Doxygen stuff, its really going faster than what I expected!
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |