[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:10:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
> I would actually suggest using GCC 4.4.3. It's gotten more testing
> than the bleeding edge.
Nevertheless, wouldn't an ICE be worth a (GCC) bug report anyway?
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/17
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/17
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/17
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/17
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/22
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/23
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/18